Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Climate Change News Roundup: 10|10|10

by billlaurelMD

ClimateChangeNewsRoundup

We apologize for this being two days late, but hopefully not a dollar short :-/.

Same as last time, I'll multitask with the usual Arctic Sea Ice diary, with Climate Change news links appearing afterward.  

News From the Arctic: September 2010 Summary

The National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) issued its summary of the mean September sea ice for 2010, including a discussion of the 2010 sea ice minimum and implications for the future  of Arctic sea ice.  Below you'll find the graphic that tells the story over the past 32 years.

septext_1979_2010

More below the fold, then the Climate Change News Roundup.



continued at Daily Kos....

DelBene closing on Reichert. Let's pick up one blue.

by rb137

I met Suzan DelBene for the first time some months ago, when we had a converstion about why she chose to run for congress. She impressed me at the time, and I have not been disappointed since. In the past six weeks, she's closed a 14 point gap to the point where the spread is within the error bars, and she has real momentum.

Joan McCarter wrote about this race yesterday and Politico called it a "sleeper alert" this morning, citing this article in the Seattle-PI. The Republicans are freaking, though, because they expected this to be a comfortable contest for David Reichert. They are putting 11th hour resources into this district to be sure.

You might remember Wa-08 prior, when Darcy Burner ran for congress in 2006 and 2008. This is a tough district that has never seated a Democrat, but is always within striking distance of making a red to blue transition. Darcy nearly succeded. More than turning a red seat blue, though, I want to tell you why we need to send Suzan to congress.  



continued at Daily Kos....

OR-1: Act Blue for Climate Heroes fighting Climate Zombies

by A Siegel

One of the most striking -- and most unreported -- elements in the 2010 elections is the fundamental difference between the two parties candidates when it comes to science.

Quite simply, when it comes to the questions related to climate science, the vast majority of the Democratic Party candidates would rate a categorization of reasonable to extremely good (climate heroes).  While, on the other side, the Republican Party has seen its candidates and Party's message move from Climate Peacocks (acknowledging human impacts on climate change while inhibiting action) to Climate Zombies (rejecting and undermining science, ready to see massive damage to American wealth and security in the name of protecting their fossil-foolish donors).

Today, we have the good news that a Democratic candidate has chosen to highlight the difference -- accurately calling out his opponent as a Climate Zombie.



continued at Daily Kos....

My Telephone Conference with Van Jones, Dolores Huerta & Pam Tau Lee

by Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse

I was one of the bloggers invited to participate in this telephone press conference with these three advocates of human rights and environmental justice.

It was announced at this press conference that Van Jones, Dolores Huerta and Pam Tau Lee have joined the fight against Proposition 23.  The three endorsed Communities United Against the Dirty Energy Prop, a grassroots coalition established to engage low income Californians and communities of color against Prop 23, the ballot measure written to nix in California our climate change law, AB 32.

The message from the phone conference was that Prop 23 is a very underhanded measure designed to continue pollution that is now harming our health, and to protect Big Oil from having to compete with green energy investments that are now booming in California. It is not a job protector but a destroyer of jobs and good health.



continued at Daily Kos....

The Week in Editorial Cartoons - Exorcism, InsaniTea, and Helping Jerry Brown

by JekyllnHyde


J.D. Crowe, Mobile Register

Bewitched

Christine O'Donnell has wiggled her nose and put a hex on the GOP establishment.  The novice Tea party candidate turned lots of heads, Linda Blair-like...But Karl Rove, the Warlock of W, has been taken aback by O'Donnell's victory.  Even he thinks this girl is bat$#!+ crazy and that the Republicans have been given a Tea Party roofie.

Personally, I think she's the best thing to happen to political satirists since her mentor, Sarah Palin. Republicans, on the other hand, are fingering the Yellow Pages looking for an exorcist. And maybe an antidote.



continued at Daily Kos....

GOP Wrong: Green Means More Jobs Now

by Steven D

Who could have predicted that while other manufacturing jobs declined, jobs in green industries increased in California, the state with some of the toughest environmental laws?  What a shock, eh?

In a study released Wednesday, Palo Alto-based nonprofit Next 10 and Collaborative Economics Inc. of Mountain View found that manufacturing jobs in the state's green sector grew by 19 percent between 1995 and 2008.

The increase came at the same time that overall manufacturing jobs in California tumbled 9 percent.

Furthermore, who could have known that venture capitalists, seeing California's "friendly" climate for green technologies would invest billions of dollars into growing that part of California's manufacturing sector?

(cont.)



continued at Daily Kos....

PA-Sen: Toomey disputes and debates reality

by Laurence Lewis

Pennsylvania Republican Senate nominee Pat Toomey continues to prove his disconnect from reality. On climate change, he'd already joined the club of Republicans against science, and he's standing firm. Greg Sargent:

Here's the exchange, at around the 15 minute mark of the  interview on WTIF radio:

QUESTIONER: I have a question about global warming and what Toomey's position is on that and what he believes is going on there.

TOOMEY: My view is, I think the data is pretty clear. There has been an increase in the surface temperature of the planet over the course of the last 100 years or so. I think it's clear that that has happened. The extent to which that has been caused by human activity I think is not as clear. I think that is still very much disputed and has been debated. If we go down the road of legislation like this cap and trade bill...

Right, but who, exactly, is doing the disputing and the debating here?

Once again, a joint statement (pdf) by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Chemical Society, American Geophysical Union, American Institute of Biological Sciences, American Meteorological Society, American Society of Agronomy, American Society of Plant Biologists, American Statistical Association, Association of Ecosystem Research Centers, Botanical Society of America, Crop Science Society of America, Ecological Society of America, Natural Science Collections Alliance, Organization of Biological Field Stations, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Society of Systematic Biologists, Soil Science Society of America, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research:

Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver. These conclusions are based on multiple independent lines of evidence, and contrary assertions are inconsistent with an objective assessment of the vast body of peer-reviewed science. Moreover, there is strong evidence that ongoing climate change will have broad impacts on society, including the global economy and on the environment.

The scientists don't dispute it or debate it. Toomey, like all of this year's GOP Senate nominees, is in a debate with reality. And it's only our collective future that's at stake.



continued at Daily Kos....