One of the most striking -- and most unreported -- elements in the 2010 elections is the fundamental difference between the two parties candidates when it comes to science.
Quite simply, when it comes to the questions related to climate science, the vast majority of the Democratic Party candidates would rate a categorization of reasonable to extremely good (climate heroes). While, on the other side, the Republican Party has seen its candidates and Party's message move from Climate Peacocks (acknowledging human impacts on climate change while inhibiting action) to Climate Zombies (rejecting and undermining science, ready to see massive damage to American wealth and security in the name of protecting their fossil-foolish donors).
Today, we have the good news that a Democratic candidate has chosen to highlight the difference -- accurately calling out his opponent as a Climate Zombie.
continued at Daily Kos....
