by murrayewv
This blog is quick to condemn technological solutions on little data. Diaries on the inadequacy of science and engineering abound (ironic, since we all are using computers to reach the internet). Folks are quick to jump to conspiracy theories. The problems of the oil spill are bad, but to read Daily Kos, the horrors are incredible, often in contradiction to all logic. Chiming in to doubt some of these claims has resulted in What the hell, dude? You sounded earlier as if you were defending BP, and there's shitloads of anecdotal AND empirical evidence that they're in no way worthy of it. There's a point where you just have to stop playing "devils advocate" or "supporting the underdog". Or whatever that earlier bit was. Truthfully, it didn't make a whole lot of sense in context with the rest of the discussion, but seemed more designed to introduce the idea that "the fumes just aren't that bad, so people really didn't need masks anyway....
continued at Daily Kos....
